Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Siddhartha Mukherjee's avatar

What stayed with me Sylvie, is that this isn't really an essay about technology. It's an essay about reduction.

Your phrase, "The system builds a version of you... and then treats that version as the whole of you," captures something many people have experienced without ever quite finding the language for it. That's what I think the essay does so well: it gives a name to a quiet form of modern suffering.

I also appreciated that you resist the easy temptation to make this an argument against technology itself. Instead, you ask a much more interesting question: not whether machines should exist, but whether the systems we build can become spacious enough to accommodate the irreducible complexity of being human. That shift elevates the essay from critique to vision.

And perhaps my favourite line is the last: "The work is not to shrink the human being to fit the machine, but to widen the machine to fit the human being." It feels less like a conclusion than a design principle—one that extends far beyond AI into education, healthcare, work, and almost every institution we inhabit.

I'm happily subscribing because I enjoy essays that don't simply identify a problem but give us a new lens through which to see it. I also write at The Reflective State, where I often explore the hidden assumptions beneath our institutions and everyday lives. If curiosity ever leads you there, I think The Implicit Behind the Explicit might make for an interesting companion piece, and I'd genuinely love to hear your thoughts on it.

Katherine Israelson Scott's avatar

“The new claustrophobia” gives a name to something I have felt in today’s world and never had words for. Thank you for giving language to this experience.

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?